Header image alt text

Harold Goodwin's Blog

The UK Visa Barrier

Posted by goodwinhj on July 16, 2012
Posted in Uncategorized  | No Comments yet, please leave one

John Waite’s latest report for Face the Facts addresses the conflict between the economic objective of growth and the UK’s visa policy.

In August 2010 Prime Minister Cameron recognised that tourism is vital in helping get the UK’s finances in shape, saying it is “fundamental to the rebuilding and re-balancing of our economy”. He said the industry already contributed £115 bn to the British economy every year, and would provide “one of the best and fastest ways” of generating jobs and income. The ambition was to be in top five destinations, for 0.5% increase we would add £2.7bn and more than 50,000 jobs.
Listen to the speech

The process and cost of applying for a UK visa is discouraging large numbers of tourists from new markets in China, India and the Far East. The visa system is described John Waite as “uniquely complicated, intrusive and long-winded”, designed to deter tourists? 1 in 4 apparently do not complete the form, too complicated and intrusive. Then there are the documents, the interview and the biometric demands.

One of the Chinese interviewees describes Britain as “the origin of contemporary civilisation”.
A Schengen visa allows entry to 26 countries for €60 and £80 for the UK
Listen to the programme on line

The Olympics reveals our problems

Posted by goodwinhj on July 12, 2012
Posted in Uncategorized  | No Comments yet, please leave one

Tonight’s London Evening Standard is headlined Olympic Crisis – singular. Although it reports that with the Olympics two weeks away the “London Games are struck by double blow”.

Problem 1: The M4 Motorway remains closed although it was expected to have re-opened. The man in charge of repairing it is reported to be saying that six mile stretch of it is unsafe. The M4 was to provide the Olympic route for officials, athletes and spectators arriving through Heathrow. It is not clear that the route will reopen. Read more

Problem 2: G4S had a contract worth £284m to provide security for the Games. 3,500 troops are being deployed to fill this hole in security at a cost of £20m. The redeployed troops include many returning from Afghanistan and losing leave and 1,000 being redeployed from Germany.

Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former Army officer, said his old battalion had been ordered to provide security for Olympic tennis. He protested: “They’re literally just back from Afghanistan.
“Last week they were warned many of them were being made redundant from troops cuts, now they’re being told their leave is going to be cancelled. Very bitter pills to swallow.”

Labour MP David Winnick said Britain was becoming an “international embarrassment as a result of [Mrs May’s] incompetence”.

G4S said “it had been involved in an “unprecedented recruitment, training and deployment exercise on a tight timescale”.

Surprising that they did not work that out when the bid for the work.

Read more

The Olympics are showcasing modern Britain – warts and all.

Worse news on Friday 13th

“A senior Government source told The Independent that the contract with G4S did not include a penalty clause.

The revelation appears to contradict a statement by the Home Secretary Theresa May in the House of Commons. She told MPs that while the contract was between G4S and the Games organisers Locog, she understood that there were “penalties within that contract”.

A source said that in fact it was a pro-rata agreement where G4S were paid for each extra security guard they supplied – and not penalised if they did not make the overall target. “The person who negotiated the contract should be shot,” the source said.” Read more

G4S think highly of themselves: “The world’s leading international security solutions group” Their site

Reports in The Guardian suggest that G4S is far from that

A recruit who was interviewed in March and completed training last month, said: “There are people like me that are vetted and trained in security and would be happy to work, but can’t. Some of the classes were of around 200 in size with only two trainers accommodating the training for a class of this size.

“I am yet to hear from G4S regarding my screening, accreditation, uniform or even a rough start date. I know many people also who will be commencing work on 27 July who have had absolutely no scheduled on-site training. They are simply being chucked into their role on x-ray machines, public screening areas and even athlete screening areas.”

Another guard who has been trained as an x-ray operator, complained that he was unable to get through to G4S to find out when and where he was meant to be working, and was once left on hold on the phone for 38 minutes.

One student applicant said he had already spent £650 on travel and hotel bills to attend training and was now worried that, because he had not received any accreditation or rota from G4S, he might not be given the shifts that would enable him to cover those costs. He said he had expected to earn about £2,000 over the period of the Games.

G4S’s own Facebook page for new recruits is littered with similar complaints.”

Read more in The Guardian

 

The UK’s Guardian reported on Tuesday that children in care are to get more protection against ‘export trade’. This is not a follow-up to the issue which is being raised in Cambodia and which was raised last year during WTMWRTD. This is a story about the UK.
The Guardian reported that the UK government will announce measures shortly to end the “export trade” in vulnerable children around the English regions that has led to concentrations of care homes, some a short walk away from convicted sex offenders. In the UK private industry has set up clusters of care homes for vulnerable young people to save costs in cheaper areas – such as the deprived north-west or along the coast.
In the UK this looks like a lucrative business. The UK’s children’s minister said £1bn a year was being spent on 5,000 children in care – an average of £200,000 per child. The Guardian reports that that there has been a rise in financial firms buying up companies that provide social services. Baird Capital, a private equity firm, owns Castlecare’s 40 children’s homes – which in 2009 was in the headlines for charging £378,000 to a council for one child. Two of England’s three biggest private providers of foster placements are owned by City firms.
Tourism and Child Protection has long been a major concern of many people working within the industry including World Travel Market who, in the past, has worked with the UNWTO and ECPAT, the champion of children’s rights, promoting greater awareness and recognition of the issues.
This year’s session on Touirsm and Child Protection, on Tuesday of World Travel Market is focussing not on paedophilia so much as the broader challenge of ensuring child protection whether the issue arises amongst the tourists, in their families, or between the tourists and local children.
The panel will explore how the industry can more effectively address the challenge of protecting children.
Disquiet continues to grow as travel and tourism unwittingly contributes to internal child trafficking. Unscrupulous orphanages are recruiting or purchasing children to ‘earn’ money from tourists.
Child protection is not just about paedophilia
Nowhere is responsible travel more important than in the area of child protection and the prevention of abuse. The abuse by paedophiles is an obvious danger to address – but their are other dangers: the removal of children from their communities to spurious orphanages; the use of children to beg from and sell to tourists, child labour, children being left to fend for themselves while parents party.
Michael Horton of ConCERT Cambodia, a key player in the development of child protection in Cambodia, spoke eloquently about this at last year’s WTMWRTD – A Little Responsible Tourism is a Dangerous Thing… and this year he chairs the panel.